SD as Neurological Condition


Posted by Narelle lehane ® (Narelle Lehane,Narelle lehane), May 27,2001,22:09   Archive
My SD had a sudden onset, and I have had it for 15 years. In all that time (if we exclude the misdiagnosis perios - 6 years) I have firmly believed that this was a neurological condition, a form of focal dystonia. I am now taking neurontin (gabapentin) which is helping immeasurably. In the past I have taken various SSRI anti-depressants (they inhibit seratonin re-uptake) and these have also had a marked effect on on my voice. Botox also helped for a while in treating the physical syptoms of the problem. I have no doubt there are many individual ways to tackle the sypmtoms of SD, including surgery like I had and like Dr Berke's. But I firmly believe that the answer to this problem lies in the research being done into dytonia and other movement disorders that look at the actual difference in brain chemistry and try to correct that. No-one would tell a Prkinsons patient who had dyskensia as a side effect from L-dopa that they could just let go, think positive and it will go away - it wont. If, as I believe, SD is a focal dystonia, the same goes for that. The sypmtoms may be relieved soewhat, and if it's a mild case, they may not even be discernable, but the brain chemistry in the basal ganglia is the key to this problem, be it SD, ST or generalised dystonia. I wish more emphasis could be placed on getting involved in that side of the problem (especially our doctors) rather than "fix-ups" of the symptoms...the more people involved the better.



Recommend Current pageAuthor Profile
Replies to this message


Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : SD as Neurological Condition --- Narelle lehane
Posted by David Barton (NZ) ® , May 27,2001,22:31 Top of Thread Archive
Narelle, I'm glad you've posted this.

I believe we need to remind ourselves that SD is a neurological disorder, the outward manifestation of laryngeal dystonia, as it were. This was explained well at the Detroit symposium - that SD is the name given to how we sound, but the disorder is actually laryngeal dystonia.

It is easy to be distracted by claims that SD is the result of 'vocal abuse', 'stress', or 'vitamin deficiencies' etc. and that there is something we can do to make it go away because it is 'our fault' in some way. While the "make my SD go away" options such as acupuncture, vitamin B-6, holistic health, magnet therapy etc have their advocates they are of limited or no use in treating cases of 'true' SD in my opinion.

As you say, the current 'fixes' for SD such as Botox and the various surgery options, deal with the symptoms, not the underlying problem. That is why the ongoing research in the dystonia field is so important to us.

David




Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : Re: SD as Neurological Condition --- David Barton (NZ)
Posted by Lee Swaddling ® , May 28,2001,00:09 Top of Thread Archive
Thanks David, I never knew my condition was laryngeal dystonia. The doctors have never even mentioned that t me. They have always stated that I spasmodic dysphonia. Thanks for the imperative info that several doctors have failed to inform me of.



Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : Re: SD as Neurological Condition --- Lee Swaddling
Posted by David Barton (NZ) ® , May 28,2001,04:00 Top of Thread Archive
Lee - it was a doctor in Australia (Paul Darveniza at St Vincents in Sydney) who examined me and said 'typical case of laryngeal dystonia'.

I can't recommend him highly enough if you're dealing with a case of SD in this part of the world. My NZ doctors Bren Dorman and Elizabeth Walker are excellent too - Paul Darveniza trained them in giving Botox injections for SD for the first time in NZ in 1991 - I was the first patient.

David




Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : Re: SD as Neurological Condition --- David Barton (NZ)
Posted by Lee Swaddling ® , Jun 03,2001,04:03 Top of Thread Archive
Hi David
I have an appointment with Dr Darveniza in Sydney on 14 June. thank-you for the tip.



Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : Re: SD as Neurological Condition --- Lee Swaddling
Posted by David Barton (NZ) ® , Jun 03,2001,04:08 Top of Thread Archive
Hi Lee - he's one of the best. Good luck, and if you remember give him my best.

Let us know how you get on.

David




Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : Re: SD as Neurological Condition --- David Barton (NZ)
Posted by Narelle lehane ® (Narelle Lehane,Narelle lehane), May 28,2001,00:15 Top of Thread Archive
Thanks David.
I just feel very strongly about this, especially after suffering from depression and realising just what "wonky" brain chemistry can do to a person. It is so fragile and so out of our control (for now). To me telling someone with SD that they can find "fixes" by just concentrating or whatever is akin to telling someone with manic depression to "pull their socks up and get on with it". It's not only misleading, it can be cruel and can lead to further problems. During my misdaignosis period I tried just about everything and ended up being chronically disappointed and far worse off regarding my self-image and my abilities as a person. I felt that I should be able to control the SD, and of course I coudn't. Daignosis was the best thing that happened to me, and being able to accept the condition for what it was made all the difference to my outlook and my ability to deal with the problem from a serious perspective without holding myself responsible. Communication is so important to human beings, and it is difficult enough having a disorder that effects that aspect of ones life without unrealistic expectations being placed on so-called "cures". I learnt that the hard way and feel it's an obligation to tell "new" Sd patients about the perils of searching for an answer outside of the medical diagnosis. It can lead ot many other problems like depression. I have no doubt that a "cure" for SD can be found, but it will be in the brain chemistry itself, and that is beyond anyone's control. To say otherwise, to me, is to discount the reality of the disability we have to live with and to blame it on ourselves.



Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : Re: SD as Neurological Condition --- Narelle lehane
Posted by Lynne Martinez ® , May 28,2001,05:28 Top of Thread Archive
Ditto Narelle and David. Yes.

See my recent post to Tatiana. Neurological (AND all the related stuff you two describe)!! With 8 cases of Parkinson's and 2 cases of Paranoid Schizophrenia in my recent-maternal genetic line, if anyone tells me SD is NOT neurological, I just about bust up in laughter. That contention is a joke, in my particular case, and others I've become familiar with also.

And, per my post today to Renee, it is my mother (not my father) who has the gene-structure which gave me the neurological make-up which enabled SD; AND, it is also my mother who refuses to admit that and is still in denial over 10 years later. Just as some folks on the BB and in pre-dx are in denial. My mother has enabled me to gain ALOT of practice in people who will not acknowledge SD as a neurological (and real) condition. She and I do not speak and that is sad. She blames ME for my vocal problems and refuses to acknowledge a VERY observable, family-connection on *her* side. Some patients are like my mom. People have to learn and see for themselves. Sure wish I could figure out a way for my mom to walk in my shoes...as well as some patients.

My case (depression and all that related garbage also, as you mention, Narelle) is SO VERY genetic and neurologically-obvious that I think someone should study me as a pure case. Dedo did call my case "classic" though so I guess he hit on it when the other ignorant voice-specialists (for several years) missed completely. And, by the way Narelle (FYI), the major population of us SD'ers in Michigan at the symposium had our cases come on gradually rather than suddenly. Dr. Rolnick conducted a show of hands and 90% came on gradually with only 10% coming on suddenly. You are unique!

If folks want to try everything under the sun (which I did also for over four years) that's their perogative. Since some (secondary) SD cases are caused by toxins, drugs, et al, I figure current patients seeking a solution can try everything the rest of us tried for many years. None of the numerous nine or ten alternative methods worked for me but everyone has to do what they have to do. All bodies and minds are different; and, after all, the docs in Michigan admitted that their diagnoses weren't 100% accurate. If someone has *something* which sounds like SD and isn't, it's probably an OK idea if patients try all kinds of possibilities, just to eliminate possibilities. Their case may not be SD(?). The couple of folks in Michigan who said speech therapy worked for them are probably good examples of bad diagnoses or very mild cases. At least one person probably never had SD in the first place.

To each his/her own. Anyone on this BB at least has the access to all of our deep research and experience and that should benefit all....new and old. It does rile me though when anyone contends that SD is not neurological, if only based on extensive evidence to the contrary for so many of our cases.

--Lynne




Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : Re: SD as Neurological Condition --- Narelle lehane
Posted by Jan Joiner ® , May 28,2001,12:40 Top of Thread Archive
Greeting All, Narelle, you hit the nail on the head here and you made me think of things that I went through all those years of pre diagnosis. Believe it or not, I have forgotten just how to put my feelings into words regarding SD. I think that has a lot to do with my feeling at fault for not being able to control the SD, etc. I felt so guilty until I finally got a diagnosis. I don't know what kept me going to doctors, etc. searching for an answer, but for some reason I just couldn't and wouldn't give up on my search for a satisfactory answer. I was told by the first specialist I saw that this was a functional dystonia problem. I am not sure what the difference between functional and laryngeal dystonia is though. I am just having a difficult time putting all this stuff together.

I guess most of us do have to learn the hard way to be able to put all this into prospective. I am very fortunate to have found all of you here on the BB to help me and others understand this devastating debilitating Neurological disorder. It has truly been a nightmare to say the least for me and my family. So, I want to Thank all of you who have been here to support and help anyone and everyone diagnosed with SD. Regards, Jan




Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : Re: SD as Neurological Condition --- Jan Joiner
Posted by Kim ® , Jun 07,2001,03:27 Top of Thread Archive
Hey all. This sounds SO familiar!!!! ... repeatedly. Jan, what you've said above about searching for a diagnosis sounds EXACTLY like what I've said/would say about BOTH the autism diagnosis and now the SD stuff too!!! As far as a dx re: the SD, for me, it was enough just that I had ONE doctor acknowledge that "yeah, this sounds about right." and "this sounds SO like you!!!" even just for the PROOF that it's neurological and the ammunition to repel any insistences that it's psychological!! This goes for both diagnoses, since I didn't receive the autism diagnosis til '98, at 21, and after two years of trying to get one -after longer than that trying to figure out HOW to get one around here.

Even though the doctor I've got to acknowledge the relevance of SD in my life is in a totally different field than most typical professionals that would do it she DOES have EXTENSIVE experience in developmental delays and differences in children, and by it's very nature, this means a lot in terms of motor development and problems and etc. so she has quite a lot of knowledge and experience with the neurological side of things!!! (I was pretty nervous when I brought it up with her 'cuase of my past experiences, even though she's great, but I figured if anyone's going to understand it/look at the neurological side of things, it'll be her. And once she understood that it happens when I'm not stressed too, she was convinced it was neuro. That was when I felt confident enough to show her the article specifically on SD.)

Anyways, just mostly wanted to say "yeah, I know what you mean!!" I don't know what kept me looking either, but getting the answers I knew were there validated made a BIG positive difference!!!! ...There is a Patty Loveless song I've loved on this topic since the first time I heard it; it's called "The Trouble With the Truth"; basically, it's saying that no matter how much we try to deny it, or avoid it, or disguise it as something else (or other people try to convince us to) somehow, the truth always seems to stare us int eh face, and make us look for it, and won't give up until the proper answer's found! ...that's what I've always felt,a nd it sounds like you did too.




Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : Re: SD as Neurological Condition --- Kim
Posted by Jan Joiner ® , Jun 07,2001,14:25 Top of Thread Archive
Hi Kim,

I am glad you have found this website. The NSDA has truly been a lifesaver for me. Especially after suffering for so many years without a proper diagnosis. I am sorry to hear that you have to deal with Autism along with your SD. I can only imagine how though that could be to handle.

I know having had to deal with such complex illnesses has really helped me to be a stronger person overall and I am grateful for that. Because now I have more sympathy for others who are suffering/disabled.

I hope you don't take this wrong, but it sounds like to me that you are dealing with a lot of anger in coping with your disabilities. I know for me, I have had a lot of angry, depression, sadness, etc. I have come to realize that being angry doesn't help anything, however it is a grieving stage everyone has to go through upon learning you have a disorder/disability. I am glad you have found a place to release and vent some of your feelings. I feel like all of us have had to go through this at one point or time in our life's. Maybe, I have the wrong Idea here, and if I do please forgive me, cause it is not my intention to make anyone feel upset, etc. I only want to help and to vent how I have felt from dealing with SD in the mid life stream.

I got SD at a very young age and have death with it a long time. I know the only way I've been able to deal with it is through the power of God and through learning to have patients. I only hope something I say here on this BB, Thanks to the NSDA, will help even one person out there and I'll be a happy person. Regards, Jan




Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : Re: SD as Neurological Condition --- Jan Joiner
Posted by Kim ® , Jun 08,2001,02:37 Top of Thread Archive

You wrote:"I am sorry to hear that you have to deal with Autism along with your SD."

Why? I like being autistic. I particularly like having the rest of the diagnosis so I have an explantion for why I am different, and can grow in the proper direction appreciating my differences and skills rather than constantly feeling guilty or 'defective' for my difficulties. I REALLY like being able to explain tot her people why I am the way I am and that there is nothing wrong with that! It has made a HUGE difference in my self esteem and sense of self value!

What I hate is having to deal with a world that doesnt' understand, generally has no clue, and generally doesn't care that they don't have a clue and are VERY ill suited to my needs, and is even more resistant to change than I am, and so refuse to accomodate me even in very simple ways, simply 'cause they are 'not normal'. Having been forced for many years (nearly to the point of my destruction) to 'be normal' -not only 'act normal', is the thing that caused the most damage, and is what you should be sorry for, if anyhting. That I was not allowed to grow up learning who I as and being accepted for who I was; that I was continually denigrated and dismissed because I was "not normal". Being forced to be "human' or normal would be the worst existence I could imagine, and I wouldn't wish it on ANYbody it's not natural to. (not saying being 'normal' is inherently bad in itself, but for someone who it does not come naturally to to be forced into that mold IS!!) And I can speak from experience.

You wrote:"I can only imagine how though that could be to handle."

I assume you mean "tough"... so it's a little tricky sometimes, no more so difficult than any other disability that involves variant levels of ability and functionality. I'd rather be this way than any way else!!! In my opinion, nondisabled people are very narrow minded and, to be honest, boring. I really feel they are missing a lot in life not seeing things outside their narrow perceptions of life, and other people.Not that this is confined to only nondisabled people, but they are more likely to possesse it.

You wrote: "I hope you don't take this wrong, but it sounds like to that you are dealing with a lot of anger in coping with your disabilities."

It's not the disabilities I have the anger about; it's the handicaps imposed by a world that doesn't seem to give a damn and is TOTALLY resistant to even LEARNING about differences in people. Particularly when they affect the supposedly 'core' aspects of being human. I am no less a person just because I don't prefer to communicate verbally, and don't see the meaning in most socialization. I do, however, consider it an insult to be called 'human'. "Humanoid" I will accept, but 'human' I find insulting. -Just my personal view. Most 'typical' humans are of the narrow minded, non-disabled type, and I in no way want to be associated with them. Anyways, I'm ranting, and I'll quit now unless anyone emails me privately and asks me otherwise.

Yes, you have the wrong idea about how I view my disabilities, but that's okay, I'm fully capable of correcting that. :) (assuming, of course, you're willing to take int eh new information,w hich it sounds like you are. :) )

Excuse the bitterness you may hear, I've had a particularly crappy couple of years, and only had all of my negative views of humans reinforced repeatedly, especially in teh last year and a half or so. My current landlords are also screwing with my life right now, so I'm in a particularly "cursing humans' mode right now. And of course, they WOULD have to have chosen two weeks before I had to write my deferred final in one of my classes to screw with my life, which put my ability to write it in jepardy repeatedly, which made me VERY angry. I wrote it, and am now in the process of melting down afterwards. Rather volitile mood when it comes to being screwed with right now. (not that anyone here is, but...just saying my emotions are a little hard to control right now.)

I do view the SD and some of the other more recently developing motor problems with more annoyance than the other aspects of my disability/difference/strange neurological make up, mainly 'cause they interefere with my life more, or represent genuine losses to any previous level of functioning, -and may be degenerative, which is scary, and the fact that no one really knows is even more annoying, but I try to adapt as well as possible. Right now I'm pretty upset at the world in general, more specifically the humans in the rold of my landlords 'cuase they are interfering with my ability to have a life,a nd I am REALLY tired of people screwing with my life and not allowing me to HAVE a life. I'm not mad at the disability, 'cause it's just a part of me, I'm mad at the world which is causing it to be such a handicap when it doesnt' need to be if some people would only show a little common sense and common courtesy!!! (and they at least are SUPPOSED to possess these things to a 'typical' degree, sure as hell more than i am, and yet the opposite seems to be the case!!)

anyways, sorry, I'm ranting again, didnt' mean to do that; just...

set things straight re: my attitude twoards autism/autistics (it's a way of being, not something that needs to be 'cured' or fixed' or is horribly tragic or any of the garbage like that.", and that, I will get mad sometimes at my throat misbehaving 'cause it interferes with my breathing, which is understandably annoying, and that while some of the anger/annoyance/frustation RELATES to the disability, it's mostly been at idiots who insist it's psychological, or dont' believe me when I talk to them, rather than at the disability itself.




Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : Re: SD as Neurological Condition --- Kim
Posted by Jan Joiner ® , Jun 08,2001,11:41 Top of Thread Archive
Hi Kim,

I am truly Sorry I had the idea about your feeling/disibilities. I have to be honest, I truly misunderstood the word Autism/Autistic. I would appreciate it if you would e-mail be privately lets get to know each other and understand one another more clearly. I apologize to the NSDA Bulletin Board and to You for anything I have said that offended you or your ability.

This Board is to help folks not to lay blame or hurt one feelings, etc. So, Again, please except my apology and If I can be of assistance to you, please let me know. I meant no disrespect here, I only want to be here to learn and to help others who are dealing with SD. Respectfully, Jan




Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : Re: SD as Neurological Condition --- Jan Joiner
Posted by Kim ® , Jun 08,2001,16:44 Top of Thread Archive
Don't worry about it, you didn't offend me.

Most people don't know much about autism, and what they do know is largely mis-information, so all they hear about is the bad stuff. they don't hear about anything else, and most don't even believe high functioning forms can exist. Autism Network International and AutFriends International are two organizations which are trying to change this opinion. autistics.org hosts both organizations webpages. if anybody else wants to see more accurate information from an autistic perspective.

Don't worry about it, you didn't offend me. I was just ranting in general, not at anybody in particular.

--modified by Kim at Fri, Jun 08, 2001, 16:48:50




Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : SD as Neurological Condition --- Narelle lehane
Posted by Joanne Matuzas ® , May 28,2001,11:01 Top of Thread Archive
This is my first post on this bb. I am active on the Blepharospasm
bb. I would like some feedback from those of you diagnosed with SD.
I have blepharospasm and some meige. I have had difficulties with
breathing for a year now but currently no problems with my voice or
swallowing. I have had a negative upper GI series to examine the throat area. I have also been examined by an ENT surgeon who gave me a negative re SD when he checked my larynx. Both the neurologist and ENT
surgeon think my diaphragm is spasming. Could I still possibly have
the laryngeal dystonia you mention without my voice box being affected?
I get some relief from benedryl and an anti-anxiety med. Thanks for
any input. Joanne M. CA



Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : Re: SD as Neurological Condition --- Joanne Matuzas
Posted by Jan Joiner ® , May 28,2001,13:01 Top of Thread Archive
Hi Joanne,

I'd like to Welcome you to the BB. I am sorry to learn of your difficulties and I wish you the best. I have heard of Blepharospasm, but I am not that familiar with this term. I have had ADSD for 17 years. I was told I had a functional dystonia when I first began my search in finding a diagnosis for SD. I am still trying to understand all of this and I don't know what to say at this point.

Other than I am here for you and I understand your flustration. I will be glad to help you an anyway I can. I think that some of the others here have more knowledge and understanding on the subject than I do. I know you've come to the right place to gain more knowledge on this subject. Regards, Jan





Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : Re: SD as Neurological Condition --- Joanne Matuzas
Posted by David Barton (NZ) ® , May 28,2001,17:34 Top of Thread Archive
Hello Joanne - welcome to the NSDA bulletin board.

My (non-expert) opinion is that if your voice is fine then you don't have SD - in other words, the dystonia you have is not laryngeal. However it's entirely possible you might have dystonia affecting the throat, possibly the pharynx, and upper chest and this could affect your breathing. The structure of the larynx itself has very small muscles, and these mainly control the voice. If you did have SD (laryngeal dystonia), you would definitely be aware of problems and effort in using your voice.

Other readers may have an input on this too.

Good luck in your search for answers.

David




Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : Re: SD as Neurological Condition --- David Barton (NZ)
Posted by Joanne Matuzas ® , May 28,2001,18:50 Top of Thread Archive
David, thanks for the welcome and your assessment. I really appreciate
the input as it all helps us decipher our disorder since the doctors
sometimes seem somewhat at a loss as to how to treat this. We are all affected differently and what works for one doesn't necessarily work for the next. The bulletin boards are wonderful as are the folks who participate!! Joanne M. CA



Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : Re: SD as Neurological Condition --- David Barton (NZ)
Posted by Mike Newhouse ® , May 29,2001,19:59 Top of Thread Archive
Hi Joanne,

David's "non-expert" opinion cuts straight to the matter. If your voice sounds normal (whatever that is), and more importantly, if it does not require significantly more effort (at least for ADSD ... I don't know about ABSD) to push the words out, you don't have SD.

And that's a good thing.

A web site I found to be very enlightening is http://www.dystonia-foundation.org/nsda. You will find audio samples of both ADSD and ABSD, as well as VERY good multimedia information.

Check it out ... and welcome,
Mike




Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : Re: SD as Neurological Condition --- Mike Newhouse
Posted by Lynne Martinez ® , May 30,2001,13:26 Top of Thread Archive
Thanks, Mike. By the way, your link is from the organization many of us on this BB have worked for as volunteers and the organization ALL paticipants on this BB need to support as members. As we all do periodically, you have put out the link for the NSDA, which pays for this Bulletin Board. If not for the NSDA (your link), we would not have this way to communicate.

Thanks for again putting out the link.

I have found that the "audios" are much more mild than many of our cases. IOW, many of the cases people will hear in person, if they visit a symposium or get to know SD'ers in person, are MUCH worse than these audios. Mine certainly was. I couldn't be understood at all.

Please support the NSDA (which provides this BB and these services, so that we can meet each other and hear others who sound like us). Send a check or debit your credit card through this link. The organization needs us BB-participants in order to survive.

--Lynne




Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : Re: SD as Neurological Condition --- Lynne Martinez
Posted by Mike Newhouse ® , May 30,2001,23:42 Top of Thread Archive
You are so correct Lynne. I share those audio files with anyone who'll take the time to listen, and they all remark on how much worse I sound than those clips. But they seem to educate people. It seems that no one knows about this condition unless they have it or know someone that does.

Education is the first step to a cure.

My voice is now degrading rapidly. Most often my mouth moves and no sound comes out. When sound does come out, its raspy and broken. But I keep trying.

Mike




Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : Re: SD as Neurological Condition --- Mike Newhouse
Posted by Kim ® , Jun 09,2001,02:31 Top of Thread Archive
Anyone know how to get this to work? Every time I click on it it it says "you need realplayer" I download Realplayer, and it says "you need netscape6.2 preview" or something and doesnt' actually do anyhting. I got back to the website and click on teh audio clip and it says "you need realplayer" even though I have it downloaded.



Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : Re: SD as Neurological Condition --- Joanne Matuzas
Posted by Lee Swaddling ® , May 30,2001,05:20 Top of Thread Archive
Hi Joanne
My name is Lee (female) and I just wanted to welcome you to the BB. I am new too and I have already found out more info in the last few weeks then in 11 years I have had SD. I know how frustrated you are feeling too. Anyway, welcome and keep in touch.
Take Care Lee



Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : SD as Neurological Condition --- Narelle lehane
Posted by don Dunlap ® (Donald Dunlap,don Dunlap), May 28,2001,19:18 Top of Thread Archive
My SD, like yours came on very suddenly within 2 days of a bad chest injury from a sailboat racing accident when some of the gear failed in a storm and the spinaker pole broke off the mast and hit me in the chest.
(boys and their toys.....and yes I'm still racing boats....it didn't kill me) After taking Botox injections for 6 years my doctor who is very interested in SD called me and asked if I would try Neurontin under his supervision. He thought it might help but I was his first SD patient that prescribed the med. to. You will find very few doctors who will call their patients to help them with their condition so obviously I have a tremendous amount of respect and appreciation for his interest in my case so I tried the drug. I have been on Neurontin since January and feel the best that have since coming down with SD.

I think there are different causes for SD. Some may well be inherited and some appears to either be caused by or "triggered" by different forms of stress to the body. I was sitting in the first doctors office in Houston who was giving me Botox injections and who had determined my condition and was visiting with another patient who was waiting to get a Botox injection for his SD. He was 10 years old and had gotten hit in the chest by another little league football players helmet in the same place that I was injured. I think the odds of both of our cases not being related to some form of nerve damage or tissue damage and causing SD would be a real long shot. I am thankful for having such a great doctor and for the benefit that am getting from Neurontin. I'm glad you are seeing some benefit as well.
I "appears" that many can relate the first symptoms of SD to a stress to the body and many can't but I seem to be hearing that Neurontin has benefited SD symptoms in both type of cases.





Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : Re: SD as Neurological Condition --- don Dunlap
Posted by Narelle lehane ® (Narelle Lehane,Narelle lehane), May 28,2001,22:03 Top of Thread Archive
The fact that a drug like Neurontin (gabapentin) helps us at all is indicative that SD is a dystonia and is related to subtle brain chemistry, whatever the initial cause of onset. This also suggests that there is a gene involved.
I am more inclined to believe that some diagnosed with Sd actually have MTD - Muscle Tension Dysphonia - which is just as bad a problem, and just as much a nightmare for the person involved, but is NOT SD.
I have BOTH, so it makes it easy for me to distinguish between the two, and MTD can be treated successfully in most cases by speech therapy (it's working for me). The shims I had inserted are keeping my true cords from hitting, I have seen it on a scope. Any residual speech problems I have are caused by the build up of muscle tension in the area due to the SD. You cannot control your SD, you can control MTD (with help). Mixing these two problems up just creates problems not only among patients but in the medical fraternity too.



Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : Re: SD as Neurological Condition --- don Dunlap
Posted by Mike Newhouse ® , May 29,2001,20:15 Top of Thread Archive
That's very interesting Don. I was diagnosed a couple months ago with ADSD, and of course the first treatment was speech therapy. My therapist asked many questions. From those questions I realized that I first started to lose my voice about three years ago. I also realized that it seemed to coincide with an automobile accident I had. It seems I came over a dark hill in the middle of the night and hit a steer at about 60. Of course, my truck stopped immediately, but thank God I had my seat belt on and the air bag deployed. The force of the air bag knocked me unconscious. When I woke up, the police were prying the door open to pull me out.

I wonder if the combined effects of the seat belt and air bag caused a trauma that brought on SD. Hmmm?

Thanks for your story,
Mike




Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : Re: SD as Neurological Condition --- Mike Newhouse
Posted by Lloyd Pearson(BC) ® , May 29,2001,23:14 Top of Thread Archive
Mike,

FYI, it is possible for SD ( and other types of dystonia )to be triggered by a blow to the head or sudden trauma or birth injury. You might want to check in with a neurologist who could run further tests to see if the blow to your head area has caused other problems.

Best wishes, Lloyd




Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : Re: SD as Neurological Condition --- Lloyd Pearson(BC)
Posted by Mike Newhouse ® , May 31,2001,00:05 Top of Thread Archive
Lloyd,
Thanks so much for your advice. I will heed it as soon as possible. But right now I'm in a six week dilemma with my HMO's PCP to get a referral for a second opinion on my original diagnosis.

That is so pathetic! The health care system in the U.S. needs an upgrade.

Thanks again,
Mike




Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : Re: SD as Neurological Condition --- Mike Newhouse
Posted by doris st. clair ® , May 30,2001,07:48 Top of Thread Archive
Mike, I was also in a car accident, however, I already had ADSD. I had just had a botox injection and was driving home. I stopped at a gas station for a fill up, still with my seatbelt on. After the fill up, I started the car and it just took off!! I couldn't control it!! My sister, who was riding with me said "Watch out for the gas tank" and I swerved to miss it and the only place I could go was out into 4 lanes of traffic where I was rammed in my side by a Ford Explorer. (I was driving a Buick) I was told later because I didn't remember the accident. My sister thought I was dead!!! But I survived with a severely broken leg (which has now healed) and broken ribs. I was taken to the trama ward at the nearest hospital and all I remember saying is "I just had a botox shot". LoL. They probably thought I had just tried to have my wrinkles removed. lol. To make a long story short, the botox didn't work at all. That was the first time I had that to happen so I blamed it on the trama of the accident. I do think that trauma can cause SD and also cause the botox to be ineffective.
Take Care, Doris



Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: SD as Neurological Condition

Re : SD as Neurological Condition --- Narelle lehane
Posted by Tatiana Faccini ® , May 29,2001,08:27 Top of Thread Archive
Lynne, Narelle, David and everyone,

There may be lots of differences in our cases because as Lynne says, each of us are unique, but we all have one rare thing in common: the spasms in our vocal cords. I’ve had catches and breaks in my voice for more than six years, and in many occasions I could barely talk at all. I know what it is to struggle just to be able to say a few words. I hated to record my own voice because it made me cry and feel depressed for a long time. I think I’ve had True SD.

I don’t think we can say there’s a True SD and another that just “Mimic” it or is Just Muscular Tension. What I do believe is that there may be a neurological (genetic) SD and another from unknown origin. At the moment there’s no known cure for neither one of them. There are a few “miracle”, as some of you have called them, cases of recovery from SD, mine included . They may be an evidence of a possible cure. If a cause can be discovered, a cure may be found for some of us, and this is a possibility worth to be researched, additionally to the ongoing research in the dystonia field.

Maybe it is not as important to get better terminology in the future as to get better ways of diagnosing our SD cases and a better understanding of its causes. Only this way, will doctors be able to make more accurate diagnosis, and we will have better treatment options.

I don’t think any of us should blame ourselves or think SD is our own fault. It is sad for me also that in the past, when doctors didn’t know nothing about SD we’ve had to suffer from thinking it was all in our heads. Narelle, I share your feelings about this because I’ve also been told many times to calm down when I knew I wasn’t nervous, just couldn’t talk, and SD also had a strong negative impact on my self-esteem for many years. If you tell me I just had MTD then I should doubt also of my personal and professional abilities because in spite of the fact that I am a speech pathologist I wasn't able to talk for so many years.

I’m now convinced we all suffer from an “invisible” disability as Lynne pointed out, but it may be from different etiologies (origins). Marylin’s experience proves that an underlying physical problem can cause SD, and Don Dunlop chest injury also. There may be another physical explanation (not simple voice misuse or abuse) for some of our SD cases that hasn’t been discovered yet and to it I was referring in my previous post.

I think I’m fighting your same battle and I understand your points of view because I’ve walked in your shoes. I just would like to give back a little of what I’ve have learned in a hard way and explore some other possibilities in search of more answers and a possible cure, that might benefit many of us.

--modified by Tatiana Faccini at Tue, May 29, 2001, 09:00:17




Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Distinctions are important

Re : Re: SD as Neurological Condition --- Tatiana Faccini
Posted by Narelle Lehane ® , May 29,2001,20:22 Top of Thread Archive
I believe that I have Laryngeal Dystonia, I think SD is too generic a term (obviously). And I would never say someone JUST had MTD, it's an awful condition and I wouldn't wish it on my worst enemy, but it is not LD and that's a fact. I think definitions are vitally important, perhaps not on this bb where we discuss our problems and our day-to-day struggles, but in the world of medicine, in the labs and in the pharmaceutical companies, and in the minds of Neurologists working in the area of Dystonia, especially focal dystonias, I want this distinction to be clear. It is the blurred lines that have held research back for this long and I don't want that for the future. My LD does not appear to have a genetic basis, no-one else in my family has had dystonia since time immemorial, but i'm sure there is a genetic pre-disposition to LD, and in thinking that I want the research done so that if my children, or anyone elses, get it there is more hope for them. All I know for sure is that my brain chemistry is out of balance and to correct this will take many years of painstaking research, in the meantime I have had other options which will get me through, luckily. I don't know enough about Marylin's experience, but if her treatment has made her SD better, well...did it effect her brain chem, and if so, how? And as to Don, it is well known that trauma to the body can cause brain chemistry imbalance, and if there's a genetic pre-disposition, well....
All I know that is if someone takes a drug like gabapentin , which works directly on brain chem in the area of the brain where dystonia originates, and their Sd improves, then they must have LD - unles it is the placebo effect which I find hard to believe in Don's case, or in mine.
I think distinctions are very important, I have a chronic lifelong problem unless scientists find out enough about neurotransmiters in the basal ganglia. There are many other voice problems which are as bad or worse, i'm not denying that, I just want to focus on the one I have without people questioning it...after 15 years I don't think that's unreasonable?
We all have things in common here and that's great, we can help each other through this. But to put forward "cures" for Laryngeal Dystonia is a misleading and ultmately cruel thing. It cannot be helped by speech path, or by deep breathing or B6 or hypnosis or whatever...the only fixes found so far are botox, surgery (last resort) or drugs working on the brain chem (Neurontin, Artane etc)
If someone has a diagnosis of LD and does not in fact have it, then other things may work for them and I think that's GREAT for them, not something to be worried about - I wish I didn't have it!
I hope, for all your sake's, that the docs are all wrong and you can all heave a deep breath, take some B6 and talk away. I found out the hard way that it's not going to happen to me, and I spent years praying that when i woke in the morning it would have gone, I did everything - speech path, hypnosis, relaxation, herbs blah blah, half my youth wasted in a maelstrom of denial and misdiagnosis.
I just don't want to see others waste precious time and energy, life is too short and too precious for that.
Go ever to the Dystonia Bb and talk to some of the people there. Some started out with LD and have had other symptoms progress, like Jeff Lovell (who now has cervical dystonia too) and you will see that teling an LD sufferer that Speech path will cure them is like telling a person with generalised dystonia that physio will cure them...it wont. I have been misdiagnosed by 3 speech pathologists. I am not questioning your abilities, I am just pointing out that LD is a RARE condition which can be mistaken for many other things, so obviously this would work the other way and other problems could be mistaken for LD - this is why the distinction is so important, as help for different disorders will come from different areas.
We all need help with our voices, but let's get the diagnosis clear before we waste time and energy we could be putting into acceptance and into proactively seeking a cure for dystonias of all kinds.


--modified by Narelle Lehane at Tue, May 29, 2001, 20:16:27

--modified by Narelle Lehane at Tue, May 29, 2001, 20:18:51

--modified by Narelle Lehane at Tue, May 29, 2001, 20:23:04

--modified by Narelle Lehane at Tue, May 29, 2001, 20:24:08




Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: Distinctions are important

Re : Distinctions are important --- Narelle Lehane
Posted by David Barton (NZ) ® , May 29,2001,20:44 Top of Thread Archive
Just a comment on the placebo effect you mention in here. Researchers are now questioning this:

http://news.excite.com/news/ap/010523/17/placebo-effect

They cast doubt on whether there is any such thing as a placebo effect, and feel it is more likely that any improvement in the condition could just be a result of the underlying disorder/disease waxing and waning, or the body taking responsibility for its own healing in a natural way rather than the treatment making any difference.

David

PS - I agree with the main thrust of what you are saying, Narelle. Although some who push the alternative palliatives for SD are well-intentioned, there are also others who prey on SD patients. Unfortunately when our SD is/was at its worst, many of us would do try almost anything - and that makes us vulnerable. This board is so important as a forum where we can learn from the experience of others - but it does pay to have a healthy dose of skepticism on some claims.




Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: Distinctions are important

Re : Re: Distinctions are important --- David Barton (NZ)
Posted by Narelle Lehane ® , May 29,2001,21:47 Top of Thread Archive
Sorry David, didn't mean to give impression that it was something I "believe in" per se. I just can't believe that after a month on Neurontin I have seen such a marked difference in my voice that definitely was not there before, and just meant to say I think Don is in the same category re neurotransmitter imbalance. Thanks for the link - most interesting! Still, docs keep insisting on it in the mainstream, these things take time!



Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile
Re: Distinctions are important

Re : Distinctions are important --- Narelle Lehane
Posted by Jeff Lovell ® , May 29,2001,22:16 Top of Thread Archive
Well said Narelle!
Your post should be compulsory reading - a shame it's buried in this large thread!
It would be a good idea for people who read and post on this board to follow Narelle's suggestion and visit the Dystonia BB - just click on the link at the bottom of the main page of this board. See what people with dystonia in other parts of their body have to contend with. It will help you to see how totally debilitating this can be, and why it is so important to discover the root cause of our problem.
Jeff down under



Recommend Original Message Top of Thread Where am I? Current pageAuthor Profile